Re: Protocol Action: Identity Protocol and MIB to Proposed Standard

Alan Stebbens <aks%anywhere@hub.ucsb.edu> Mon, 07 December 1992 23:29 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24115; 7 Dec 92 18:29 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24111; 7 Dec 92 18:29 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24843; 7 Dec 92 18:30 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24097; 7 Dec 92 18:29 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24090; 7 Dec 92 18:29 EST
Received: from hub.ucsb.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24833; 7 Dec 92 18:30 EST
Received: from anywhere.ucsb.edu by hub.ucsb.edu; id AA16165 sendmail 4.1/UCSB-2.0-sun Mon, 7 Dec 92 15:30:47 PST for iesg-secretary@cnri.reston.va.us
Received: from localhost by anywhere.ucsb.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA11199; Mon, 7 Dec 1992 15:30:44 -0800
Message-Id: <9212072330.AA11199@anywhere.ucsb.edu>
To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Cc: Jon Postel -- RFC Editor <postel@isi.edu>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>, The Internet Engineering Steering Group <IESG@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>, ident@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: Identity Protocol and MIB to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 07 Dec 92 17:48:11 PST. <9212071748.aa23340@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 92 15:30:43 +22306404
X-Orig-Sender: ident-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Alan Stebbens <aks%anywhere@hub.ucsb.edu>

> Protocol Quaility
	   ^^^^^^^^

Does this mean that it is okay to shoot at protocols during quail season?

Or, was this merely a typographical error for "Fraility"? 

:^)

In any case, good job on the apparent consensus.  Whew!