Re: For Your Information

["practic![e-mail]" <[e-mail]>]

I'm replying to the note of Daniel J. Bernstein, of Thu, 17 Sep 92, which
deny's any knowledge of events described by Dave Borman, or any knowledge
of Mr. Borman other than an epistolary aquaintance.

The statement "I haven't been logged on for a few days" confuses me, I'd
written Dan on Monday, 14 September on the "objection to ident submission"
thread, letting him know that I could not read past the word "incompetent"
as used in his note. It was to personalized to St. Johns, not St. Johns'
work. I received a reply on the following day, 15 September.

Dave Borman's note was sent on Wednesday, 16 September, describing an
alleged event of that same day, and Dan Bernstein's disavowal appeared
on Thursday, 17 September.

Are the "few days" referred to in Dan disavowal note Wednesday, the 16th?
Does anyone have any correspondence from Dan in the period in question?

Note, the apparent ambiguity has nothing to do with whether Dan's disavowal
is more, or less credible than Dave's original heads up note.