IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 13 March 2018 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74D312D80E for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 02:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YL58yauiqfuN for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 02:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A18C612D7FC for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 02:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id CD65A28013E; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:30:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id C75EE280314; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:30:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A6828013E; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:30:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBEF663EBE0; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:30:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B947A4020F; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:30:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:30:35 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: idna-update@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180313093035.fcax6v3zmz3nv34r@nic.fr>
References: <533bb471-da9b-64d0-76aa-a8a1251d256b@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <533bb471-da9b-64d0-76aa-a8a1251d256b@ix.netcom.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.3
X-Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000017, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2018.3.13.92416
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/1OmCMjYMFDMu34s_LVqF7UyjLL4>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:30:40 -0000

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:48:23AM -0700,
 Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote 
 a message of 107 lines which said:

> there's a general consensus that emoji and secure IDNs do not go
> together.

Since the IDNA standard does not allow emojis, I'm not sure of the
point.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email