Re: [Idna-update] IDNA and combining sequences

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Sun, 11 March 2018 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD952124B0A for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 03:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaN3uX_6x_1v for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 03:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6781201FA for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 03:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.5.159] (unknown [67.203.214.34]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 293B6200CC; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:57:35 +0100 (CET)
From: "Patrik =?utf-8?b?RsOkbHRzdHLDtm0=?=" <paf@frobbit.se>
To: "Asmus Freytag" <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: "Mark Davis =?utf-8?b?4piV77iP?=" <mark@macchiato.com>, "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com>, idna-update@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 06:57:32 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6104)
Message-ID: <2243242A-C30E-48E4-9E75-4CCBB56E0B91@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <b60b8408-5f78-0915-747e-6c3c11bb326b@ix.netcom.com>
References: <C4FBCF12821031786F472AA2@PSB> <02c29140-29f1-cc81-8c4f-8249d0f23b2c@ix.netcom.com> <1E562CDE39B4224F227E765D@PSB> <516E58F3-015D-4AD7-A3FD-0749A6890245@frobbit.se> <CAJ2xs_Gfh+wS3w2AH9rAusCmb+=xS0WsRH18zsUqeXP1kZmb+A@mail.gmail.com> <b60b8408-5f78-0915-747e-6c3c11bb326b@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_DEFA96A9-5246-4CD2-B169-3C7E15132876_="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/5cjTuriQvYXMeQdFk6r6uFGunuM>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] IDNA and combining sequences
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 10:57:42 -0000

On 11 Mar 2018, at 1:57, Asmus Freytag (c) wrote:

> However, independent of the details of what may have been exchanged a decade ago, I strongly  suspect that going over that ground is going to do little in terms of helping to make progress forward.
>
> Instead, the sole question we should be asking is what can we do to effectively improve the experience involving IDNs.

+1

Thanks Asmus.

   paf