IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Tue, 13 March 2018 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB5B120454 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CGlD4J5DpwS for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64AF1120725 for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.196.199.114] (unknown [IPv6:2620:f:8000:210:dd91:8c3:5ae7:2d8c]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E64BB28494; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:35:29 +0100 (CET)
From: "Patrik =?utf-8?b?RsOkbHRzdHLDtm0=?=" <paf@frobbit.se>
To: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: idna-update@ietf.org, bortzmeyer@nic.fr
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:35:41 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6105)
Message-ID: <CCA87139-642B-4E75-B98E-1EC9002828EE@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20180313201720.2C67F2286F17@ary.local>
References: <20180313201720.2C67F2286F17@ary.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_952F4B67-A999-4134-BC12-6E385C7E2E59_="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/9Rum5OhXKR9piE0ISmquTsL2V-Y>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:35:36 -0000

On 13 Mar 2018, at 16:17, John Levine wrote:

> There have been some presentations on what's permissible and emoji specifically which the ICANN leadership appears to understand.
> Domains like .WS will sell whatever they can sell and there's not much anyone can do about that.

I think it is important to separate these three things from each other -- at least as much as possible:

- The IETF work on IDNA2008

- The ICANN work on LGRs and other generic policy issues

- Compliance issues

It looks to me like if either people intentionally muddy the water or comment on issues they are not plugged in on (or both :-D ).

   paf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email