IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890 (5484)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 28 August 2018 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03ACD130F09 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 04:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_FAIL=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFJjISf96FN7 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 04:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70509130EA2 for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 04:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id C82227C0E92; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:40:03 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2957C0695 for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:40:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7amqckVm2vi for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:40:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=4.31.198.49; helo=rfc-editor.org; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfc-editor.org; receiver=idna-update@alvestrand.no
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5644A7C059C for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:40:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 173ADB8152A; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 04:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: john+ietf@jck.com, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, vint@google.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: poccil14@gmail.com, idna-update@alvestrand.no, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180828113938.173ADB8152A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 04:39:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/EQBer-jm9Lk1jE39x5BeCussOT0>
Subject: [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890 (5484)
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:40:08 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5890,
"Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5484

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>

Section: 2.3.2.1

Original Text
-------------
   For IDNA-aware applications, the three types of valid labels are
   "A-labels", "U-labels", and "NR-LDH labels", each of which is defined
   below.


Corrected Text
--------------
   For IDNA-aware applications, the three types of valid labels are
   "A-labels", "U-labels", and "NR-LDH labels", each of which is defined
   below and in section 2.3.1.

Notes
-----
The term NR-LDH label is actually defined in section 2.3.1, not later in this section.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5890 (draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework
Publication Date    : August 2010
Author(s)           : J. Klensin
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (Revised)
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email