Re: [Idna-update] [I18nrp] Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-unicode11-05.txt> (IDNA2008 and Unicode 11.0.0) to Informational RFC

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 07 December 2018 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABE8130E8D; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:45:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydwjPvFV49V6; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:45:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ladybird.maple.relay.mailchannels.net (ladybird.maple.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.214.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F17130E8B; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:45:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999F0283970; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:45:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.30.62]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1BA34283724; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:45:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.16.2); Fri, 07 Dec 2018 16:45:55 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Versed-Army: 788b113317dfddff_1544201155443_3340140798
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1544201155443:1374311343
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1544201155443
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB5A802EA; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:45:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=Atp1orYllMtftz erhf9Hnyz46pQ=; b=a65S/0vatIvokQlxyG7dB9l0imu5Vt2/pFw7s98ShJEip2 wTn9iz771W26sx8IACyorKKJ4dpztT2iSxohmH65Mo7OTw/FZ1QEz/yw4tGOYGj6 3SVtNzXrrmleQGuwRKOvqNtrRMXBNbT32mc1C81UYZsMOeNmSuO4bIgPxskNU=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a36.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CED7A802E6; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 08:45:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:45:47 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a36
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "Asmus Freytag (c)" <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>, paf=40frobbit.se@dmarc.ietf.org, i18nrp@ietf.org, LMM@acm.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Klensin John <john@jck.com>, idna-update@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181207164546.GX15561@localhost>
References: <f4417f80-fa86-11e6-baf7-2365981e18b1@ix.netcom.com> <48A2A546-4FEA-4060-8706-34D210B2ABAF@frobbit.se> <055301d48dc8$0ea95120$2bfbf360$@acm.org> <07CB0B3B-E48A-40CD-BBC9-E6CAA2FB29F0@frobbit.se> <50A496896DE57696A5184DC2@PSB> <BD925131-58F8-457B-B553-B15AC87D274E@frobbit.se> <20181207064147.GT15561@localhost> <CAHxHggfbOWw-8ov9HoNTDecCzM7yNimM86qfr6aLv3vQpzHU4g@mail.gmail.com> <20181207065006.GV15561@localhost> <fd8df875-41ad-6935-f8dd-ae57a152116b@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fd8df875-41ad-6935-f8dd-ae57a152116b@ix.netcom.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedrudefledgleduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhppdhhvghloheplhhotggrlhhhohhsthdpihhnvghtpedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtohepnhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/EYlrmEfynVCgTXuRxTMpJB9itlY>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] [I18nrp] Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-unicode11-05.txt> (IDNA2008 and Unicode 11.0.0) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 16:45:59 -0000

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 12:52:20AM -0800, Asmus Freytag (c) wrote:
> On 12/6/2018 10:50 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:45:02AM -0500, Vint Cerf wrote:
> >>>The ability to type in domainnames you see in ads is not that
> >>>interesting for the obvious reason that advertisers would not
> >>>choose to use domainnames that their targets cannot type in!
> >>VGC: I am not so sure advertisers are that smart...
> >
> >I am quite certain that they are, or if not, will be.  They spend
> >lots of money, and they hate to spend it badly.  They even spend lots
> >of money on how to spend lots more money well.
> 
> It may not be advertisers that use such 'broken' labels. All sorts of
> mischief can be created with stuff that your system won't let you type
> (even if you are a native user on a "native" system).

Anyone who wants their target audience to be able to type in a label
will pick labels wisely.

Anyone who does not care whether their target audience is able to type
in a label will be free to construct more interesting labels.

I see nothing wrong with that.

Of course, we weren't discussing malicious use of confusables.  That's
another story.

Nico
--