IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idna-update] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5890 (6929)

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Sun, 10 April 2022 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C3A3A1629 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 22:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.314
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=frobbit.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9jXxDef42JSG for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 22:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.alvestrand.no (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f9:c010:a44b::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924153A1623 for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 22:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 494DF4104B; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 07:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=85.30.129.176; helo=mail.frobbit.se; envelope-from=paf@frobbit.se; receiver=<UNKNOWN>
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.176]) by smtp.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4074E41049 for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 07:03:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.165.72.242] (unknown [192.165.72.242]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 280B1207FF; Sun, 10 Apr 2022 07:03:27 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=frobbit.se; s=mail; t=1649567007; bh=CK8qD6a6TAlRkDA9rBjIbzETKreraUJUgNplS/Hfkb4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QS7NphtT2B2XlX0UKRDDP3UNrSF82lshwGTY/7blcao2uFhBI0c3gW18MP9TMwOkJ bl0YpsyHrTSNy04qTP5v2XIoErnFIQYN4qADILh0+FIn3ZDK+Y4TU9iTmwpE5u1R9U sKdcF1QY4C89cEr0thFcauqrSMMPppY4PAG5UAhk=
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, mannyman123442@yahoo.com, john+ietf@jck.com, superuser@gmail.com, idna-update@alvestrand.no, vint@google.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 07:03:25 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5884)
Message-ID: <1A6B7F7F-37D8-43AC-AA87-7C406A0DD621@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <6EB48DF3-1314-48D5-B37A-720A50C92990@vpnc.org>
References: <20220409201740.88EFA4C1D9@rfcpa.amsl.com> <6EB48DF3-1314-48D5-B37A-720A50C92990@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_185C8933-D48D-4D0C-98CD-76A60A6AD2B3_="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/Sy5AYCX3RTCeEQQ_RsS8KFc9Yso>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5890 (6929)
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 05:03:38 -0000

On 10 Apr 2022, at 2:26, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Please reject. This is an editorial comment, not an erratum.

+1

> --Paul Hoffman
>
> On 9 Apr 2022, at 13:17, RFC Errata System wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5890,
>> "Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6929
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Jesus Alvarado <mannyman123442@yahoo.com>
>>
>> Section: 5890
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> Because A-labels (the form actually used in the
>> DNS) are potentially much more compressed than UTF-8 (and UTF-8 is,
>> in general, more compressed that UTF-16 or UTF-32), U-labels that
>> obey all of the relevant symmetry (and other) constraints of these
>> documents  may be quite a bit longer, potentially up to 252 characters
>> (Unicode code points).
>>
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> Because A-labels (the form actually used in the
>> DNS) are potentially much more compressed than UTF-8 (and UTF-8 is,
>> in general, more compressed that UTF-16 or UTF-32), U-labels that
>> obey all of the relevant symmetry (and other) constraints of these
>> documents  may be quite a bit longer, potentially up to 252 characters
>> (Unicode code points).
>> But in the encode (Unicode) they both need the process that some don’t understand in a wrap and curl. To different but same meaning in the most different way.
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> I had a ion encoding working bigger in a math calculation.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5890 (draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-13)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework
>> Publication Date    : August 2010
>> Author(s)           : J. Klensin
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (Revised)
>> Area                : Applications
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> IDNA-UPDATE mailing list
> IDNA-UPDATE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status