IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idna-update] [Ext] Re: emoji and security

Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org> Wed, 14 March 2018 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <kim.davies@iana.org>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9242120227 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0gw7rxyCmVO for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB581120047 for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from KIDA-6861.local (unknown [10.32.60.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2CEDE0B03; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:17:03 -0400
From: Kim Davies <kim.davies@iana.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: "idna-update@ietf.org" <idna-update@ietf.org>, Michel Suignard <michel@suignard.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, Patrik =?iso-8859-1?B?RuRsdHN0cvZt?= <paf@frobbit.se>
Message-ID: <20180314171701.GA75066@KIDA-6861.local>
References: <533bb471-da9b-64d0-76aa-a8a1251d256b@ix.netcom.com> <DM5PR1901MB219712F39A6297F9A147312DA2D30@DM5PR1901MB2197.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <20180313202505.ztersmy2z5xuxlvp@mx4.yitter.info> <DM5PR1901MB2197A704B3233E5236EB703AA2D20@DM5PR1901MB2197.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <ac2e51de-a9ad-c8ee-96b0-5b50a0e225c4@ix.netcom.com> <20180314011813.2vhpqle3bt726tbb@mx4.yitter.info> <B365481D-F9B6-46AD-BC3A-CC98695131E2@frobbit.se> <DM5PR1901MB219746D7A8CC8E1699DDC773A2D10@DM5PR1901MB2197.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <20180314151515.GA70553@KIDA-6861.local> <20180314161129.t6frhcmv6cvqmyrj@sources.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180314161129.t6frhcmv6cvqmyrj@sources.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/iLJ1C_8ZY8tJ4hA905yFoRM1WF0>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] [Ext] Re: emoji and security
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:17:09 -0000

Quoting Stephane Bortzmeyer on Wednesday March 14, 2018:
> 
> Let me check that I understood RFC 5892: an implementation can
> calculate its own tables but, if they follow RFC 5892, they should
> get, FOR THE SAME UNICODE VERSION, the same result than IANA, or
> anyone else, no?

That is correct. 

kim

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email