Re: [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890 (5484)
Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Tue, 04 September 2018 09:30 UTC
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77605130E84 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 02:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OHLzkkLdDFf0 for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 02:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 352C6130E76 for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 02:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 49EDE7C05D5; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:30:25 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: idna-update@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF50A7C09A3 for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:30:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mW73aiZInWIx for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:30:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:29:47 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=67.222.106.46; helo=host.presenceweb.org; envelope-from=jefsey@jefsey.com; receiver=idna-update@alvestrand.no
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE8BF7C05D5 for <idna-update@alvestrand.no>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:30:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 251.47.14.81.rev.sfr.net ([81.14.47.251]:44021 helo=MORFIN-PC.jefsey.com) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1fx7CD-0004QX-U5; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:00:26 +0200
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:01:04 +0200
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, vint@google.com
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Cc: poccil14@gmail.com, idna-update@alvestrand.no
In-Reply-To: <F578293C1FEB9ACE5B2E5EEB@[192.168.1.165]>
References: <20180828113938.173ADB8152A@rfc-editor.org> <F578293C1FEB9ACE5B2E5EEB@[192.168.1.165]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - alvestrand.no
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Authenticated-Sender: host.presenceweb.org: jefsey@jefsey.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20180904093024.BF50A7C09A3@mork.alvestrand.no>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/uRjD4xdw4gUmbCVq-OkM8qWgHFg>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890 (5484)
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:30:28 -0000
+1 jfc At 16:57 28/08/2018, John C Klensin wrote: >This erratum, as Vint indicates, is correct. In the evolution >of 5890, the definitions were reshuffled several times and it is >easy to guess how the error might have occurred. I don't know >why neither I nor the RFC Editor missed it in the final version, >but mea culpa. > >For a future version, almost certainly the right fix is to >rearrange the text again so that all of the definitions either >follow or precede that comment. > >Peter, thanks for the careful reading. > john > > >--On Tuesday, August 28, 2018 04:39 -0700 RFC Errata System ><rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5890, > > "Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): > > Definitions and Document Framework". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5484 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Type: Editorial > > Reported by: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com> > > > > Section: 2.3.2.1 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > For IDNA-aware applications, the three types of valid > > labels are "A-labels", "U-labels", and "NR-LDH labels", > > each of which is defined below. > > > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > For IDNA-aware applications, the three types of valid > > labels are "A-labels", "U-labels", and "NR-LDH labels", > > each of which is defined below and in section 2.3.1. > > > > Notes > > ----- > > The term NR-LDH label is actually defined in section 2.3.1, > > not later in this section. > > > > Instructions: > > ------------- > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, > > please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be > > verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the > > verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the > > report, if necessary. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC5890 (draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-13) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Internationalized Domain Names for > > Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework > > Publication Date : August 2010 > > Author(s) : J. Klensin > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : Internationalized Domain Names in > > Applications (Revised) Area : Applications > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > >_______________________________________________ >IDNA-UPDATE mailing list >IDNA-UPDATE@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
- [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5890… RFC Errata System
- Re: [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC… Vint Cerf
- Re: [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC… John C Klensin
- Re: [Idna-update] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC… Jefsey