IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 14 March 2018 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82FB1270FC for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJk7JJQJuvgn for <idna-update@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [92.243.4.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9794F12D7EF for <idna-update@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 07:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 29309A05CE; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:53:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62F921908E1; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:49:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:49:39 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: idna-update@ietf.org, bortzmeyer@nic.fr
Message-ID: <20180314144939.ehis5fndfn7x7qqm@sources.org>
References: <20180313093035.fcax6v3zmz3nv34r@nic.fr> <20180313201720.2C67F2286F17@ary.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180313201720.2C67F2286F17@ary.local>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.3
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idna-update/xBNBBg_KiaKxkAcNbMKkm4GBPl0>
Subject: Re: [Idna-update] emoji and security
X-BeenThere: idna-update@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Internationalized Domain Names in Applications \(IDNA\) implementation and update discussions" <idna-update.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idna-update/>
List-Post: <mailto:idna-update@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idna-update>, <mailto:idna-update-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:53:11 -0000

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:17:19PM -0400,
 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote 
 a message of 22 lines which said:

> You know and I know that emoji domains are a bad idea for all sorts
> of reasons.

I said it was "illegal", from RFC 5892, which is not exactly the same
thing.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email