Re: [Idnet] Informal on-site meeting in IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management

Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville <granville@inf.ufrgs.br> Thu, 13 July 2017 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <granville@inf.ufrgs.br>
X-Original-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A0A127977 for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 05:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.941
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.941 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zf9SL5nij-Vs for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 05:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.inf.ufrgs.br (smtp.inf.ufrgs.br [143.54.11.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2400B129AB2 for <idnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 05:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.44.118] (unknown [179.86.206.52]) by smtp.inf.ufrgs.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DEE17AB1; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:14:26 -0300 (BRT)
From: Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville <granville@inf.ufrgs.br>
Message-Id: <136ABBB2-DA94-47F3-9B20-8AA8789F9F36@inf.ufrgs.br>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_350E3C3D-5C43-4679-8EDE-E1ECAB0D4541"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 06:54:57 -0300
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CDFDD89@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Cc: "idnet@ietf.org" <idnet@ietf.org>, yanshen <yanshen@huawei.com>, Toerless Eckert <toerless.eckert@huawei.com>, Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>, =?utf-8?B?7ZmN7Jqp6re8?= <yghong@etri.re.kr>, "laurent.ciavaglia@nokia-bell-labs.com" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CDFDD89@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idnet/F6kVMjBHAhyII3tu9n1A3dmXkmk>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:01:18 -0700
Subject: Re: [Idnet] Informal on-site meeting in IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management
X-BeenThere: idnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The IDNet \(Intelligence-Defined Network\) " <idnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:idnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:20:02 -0000

Sheng,

Let me know once you find a place for the meeting and I’ll be there.

Lisandro

> Em 13 de jul de 2017, à(s) 00:34, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> escreveu:
> 
> Hi, all,
>  
> Although there was a few efforts to organize AI-relevant works in IETF/IRTF, so far we have not convergent on a solid common interest area that some of us could start to work together towards some-level of standardization. Let’s try again with a smaller scope. We would like to call interests on applying AI/ML into NETWORK MANAGEMENT. The target would be to have a dedicated session to discuss AI-based network management in the NMRG in IETF100 or IETF101.
>  
> I am trying set up a meeting place for Tuesday or Thursday before the morning session. These who are interested please send me an email with your preferred day. I will send the information later to on-site participants who expressed interests directly. Giving that the meetecho is only for formal WG/RG meetings, I am afraid it is almost impossible for remote participant. In the past, we did use webex. But the quality is bad without professional meeting equipment. It was bad to bridge four people on site with one remote participant.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Sheng