Re: [Idnet] Informal on-site meeting in IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management

Jérôme François <jerome.francois@inria.fr> Sun, 16 July 2017 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jerome.francois@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AA8129B40 for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a3CxWO05j9oF for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32300126BF3 for <idnet@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,371,1496095200"; d="scan'208,217";a="231691442"
Received: from dynamic-194-228-20-213.ipv4.broadband.iol.cz (HELO [192.168.2.161]) ([194.228.20.213]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 16 Jul 2017 23:32:52 +0200
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "idnet@ietf.org" <idnet@ietf.org>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CDFDD89@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <toerless.eckert@huawei.com>, "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>, "laurent.ciavaglia@nokia-bell-labs.com" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia-bell-labs.com>, =?UTF-8?B?7ZmN7Jqp6re8?= <yghong@etri.re.kr>, "granville@inf.ufrgs.br" <granville@inf.ufrgs.br>, yanshen <yanshen@huawei.com>, Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgRnJhbsOnb2lz?= <jerome.francois@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <3ee11390-ebdf-490c-16f2-a0b97e503550@inria.fr>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:32:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CDFDD89@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------006ECE19C62EA41671DFD990"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idnet/GX2PKXQBjQQRLc_OYogrqB5-R4k>
Subject: Re: [Idnet] Informal on-site meeting in IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management
X-BeenThere: idnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The IDNet \(Intelligence-Defined Network\) " <idnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:idnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 21:33:01 -0000

Hi,


Le 13/07/2017 à 05:34, Sheng Jiang a écrit :
>
> Hi, all,
>
>  
>
> Although there was a few efforts to organize AI-relevant works in
> IETF/IRTF, so far we have not convergent on a solid common interest
> area that some of us could start to work together towards some-level
> of standardization. Let’s try again with a smaller scope. We would
> like to call interests on applying AI/ML into NETWORK MANAGEMENT. The
> target would be to have a dedicated session to discuss AI-based
> network management in the NMRG in IETF100 or IETF101.
>
That would be great to maintain our effort at IETF.
>
>  
>
> I am trying set up a meeting place for Tuesday or Thursday before the
> morning session. These who are interested please send me an email with
> your preferred day. I will send the information later to on-site
> participants who expressed interests directly. Giving that the
> meetecho is only for formal WG/RG meetings, I am afraid it is almost
> impossible for remote participant. In the past, we did use webex. But
> the quality is bad without professional meeting equipment. It was bad
> to bridge four people on site with one remote participant.
>
Better Tuesday for me.

Best regards,
jerome
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
>  
>
> Sheng
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IDNET mailing list
> IDNET@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet