Re: [Idnet] Intelligence-Defined Network Architecture and Call for Interests

Jérôme François <jerome.francois@inria.fr> Fri, 31 March 2017 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jerome.francois@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF83129546 for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UC_yH4kGckBi for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA2112970F for <idnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,250,1486422000"; d="scan'208,217";a="266955511"
Received: from unknown (HELO [172.16.4.191]) ([38.69.5.76]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 31 Mar 2017 06:57:31 +0200
To: idnet@ietf.org
References: <3B110B81B721B940871EC78F107D848CF33029@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com> <20170331030720.GF4808@spectre> <9a761473-d188-5a1a-d31e-6ad991dfd1e5@nokia-bell-labs.com> <0e924c06-b8fb-48fa-5137-f4de120b03db@nokia-bell-labs.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgRnJhbsOnb2lz?= <jerome.francois@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <b6b93efd-9d78-f4f7-80db-411a39a745a6@inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 06:57:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0e924c06-b8fb-48fa-5137-f4de120b03db@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CFBF76BC70DEDAA5FED98F7F"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idnet/YBZVvRuBKhkA_Jbf8aCouORjutI>
Subject: Re: [Idnet] Intelligence-Defined Network Architecture and Call for Interests
X-BeenThere: idnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The IDNet \(Intelligence-Defined Network\) " <idnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:idnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 04:57:37 -0000

Hi,

Data is primordial but sharing them is very difficult (I'm not an
operator) due to privacy but also legislative issues.
Here are few comments:
1) on anonymization: this far from being simple and I do not believe
that anybody can guarentee that nothing will be leaked out as sensitive
data (and at the end this will the responsability of the operator who
have shared the data).
-> That is why sharing but not in public manner (with a NDA) is still
the most viable solution (in my opinion)

2) charaterizing the data we would like to access is clearly a first
step (even if many of us like to have raw data)

3) Another possibility is to run the algorithms you want to test on a
remote platform without accessing the data and get back the results
(also here there might be some safguards to avoid that program tries to
extract sensitive data as results !)

jerome

Le 31/03/2017 à 06:15, Laurent Ciavaglia a écrit :
> Also CAIDA has multiple measurement tools to collect data.
> Some IETFers are specialists of these tools and report findings on
> data collected via these tools.
>
> Might be something to look at.
>
> Also, and with this I'm finished for today, documenting the
> characteristics of the requested data set(s) might help.
>
> BR, Laurent.
>
> On 31/03/2017 06:12, Laurent Ciavaglia wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A couple of suggestions:
>>     -Why not raise this point / request in various WGs (e.g. in the
>> OPS Area) and RGs (e.g. MAPRG, NMRG).
>>     -Why not work with the IETF meeting NOC to collect data sets?
>>
>> BR, Laurent.
>>
>> On 31/03/2017 05:07, Pedro Martinez-Julia wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> That's it and I insist that, if anybody in the mailing list is bound to
>>> an operator or a similar organization that manages huge amounts of data,
>>> just the data we need, please try to provide it. We will be able to help
>>> you to build some anonymization solution, if needed. Thank you.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Pedro
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Laurent Ciavaglia
>>
>> Nokia, Bell Labs
>>
>>  
>>
>> +33 160 402 636
>>
>> route de Villejust - Nozay, France
>>
>> linkedin.com/in/laurent.ciavaglia
>>
>
> -- 
>
> Laurent Ciavaglia
>
> Nokia, Bell Labs
>
>  
>
> +33 160 402 636
>
> route de Villejust - Nozay, France
>
> linkedin.com/in/laurent.ciavaglia
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IDNET mailing list
> IDNET@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet