Re: [Idnet] IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management: Follow-up

Jérôme François <jerome.francois@inria.fr> Tue, 25 July 2017 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jerome.francois@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4DB131CCF for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZmuZpcRNU88 for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D48131CCE for <idnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,411,1496095200"; d="scan'208";a="284895957"
Received: from marly.loria.fr (HELO [152.81.8.41]) ([152.81.8.41]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 25 Jul 2017 16:26:00 +0200
To: yanshen <yanshen@huawei.com>, "idnet@ietf.org" <idnet@ietf.org>
References: <015d4fb0-496a-a9a0-e8c5-7fcf6c52caee@inria.fr> <6AE399511121AB42A34ACEF7BF25B4D297836D@DGGEMM505-MBS.china.huawei.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgRnJhbsOnb2lz?= <jerome.francois@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <b496321d-a1d0-9ed6-6e43-be155e1eb31f@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:26:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6AE399511121AB42A34ACEF7BF25B4D297836D@DGGEMM505-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idnet/_90qIbPK3MBnnRH7gjZjh_Tf1YI>
Subject: Re: [Idnet] IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management: Follow-up
X-BeenThere: idnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The IDNet \(Intelligence-Defined Network\) " <idnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:idnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:26:25 -0000

Hi,

Le 21/07/2017 à 09:32, yanshen a écrit :
> - the immediate plan is to organize a regular workshop (probably within NMRG). I
> fully support the idea as this helps to federate the community first to ambition
> then coordinated actions (regarding the issues with datasets for example). But
> recall that that will be workshop within a RG group and it is probably too early to
> identify what should be standardized  (or look at a WG in that case). Looking at
> the experience with flow measurement workshop (within NMRG as well), it
> should be more open for presentations and discussions and if a potential
> standard is identified, this can be targeted afterwards.
> I support the regular workshop (whatever in any form). I fully understand your worried about the "too early". However, I think it is better to find a common or say a potential standardized point to concentrate the focus. After that, we can expand our focus to other valuable area. A details point may help us to clear up the thought, during which we may evolve a clear methodology for the future work. Of course I totally agree with your open attitude. I mean only to concentrate the topic firstly. 
>
>
So, why not targeting a WG (rather than a RG because in my understanding
primary focus of RG is not standardization) ?


best regards,
jerome