[Idnet] 答复: //Informal on-site meeting in IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management

Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6680312EC46 for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t2shENEJ0-Xk for <idnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF1DA13146E for <idnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DKR54119; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:10:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:10:23 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 20:10:16 +0800
From: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
To: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, "idnet@ietf.org" <idnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idnet] //Informal on-site meeting in IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management
Thread-Index: AQHS/meszOrZKdDUxUaCVTNufEL1r6JX6bmQ
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:10:15 +0000
Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CE2BC60@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CE2353E@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <293443E7-307B-45C2-8E7E-3A2FE6997B16@sit.fraunhofer.de>
In-Reply-To: <293443E7-307B-45C2-8E7E-3A2FE6997B16@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.67.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927CE2BC60NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.596CA931.00B3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: baff2f773d1d4160c323ec068c2c89da
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idnet/v7kr6AVKJLYZgqIaVQk0uE6j3tk>
Subject: [Idnet] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiAgLy9JbmZvcm1hbCBvbi1zaXRlIG1lZXRp?= =?utf-8?q?ng_in_IETF99_for_applying_AI/ML_into_network_management?=
X-BeenThere: idnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The IDNet \(Intelligence-Defined Network\) " <idnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:idnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet>, <mailto:idnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:10:34 -0000

Hi, Henk,

We do not have an agenda or materials to present in tomorrow’s informal on-site meeting. It is actually a meeting for calling contributors and actions. I personally expect participators to volunteer some works rather than listening. We had such model in NMLRG. We had 5 meetings cross 4 IETF, each of meeting we have 100+ listeners, but we had only several contributors. That’s why NMLRG does make it any longer. So far, 15+ people expressed their interests and I have informed them the meeting place. Even so, I cannot guarantee the number of attendees and the number of contributors.

Regards,

Sheng

发件人: IDNET [mailto:idnet-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Henk Birkholz
发送时间: 2017年7月17日 3:13
收件人: idnet@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Idnet] //Informal on-site meeting in IETF99 for applying AI/ML into network management

Hello Sheng,

most of my activities target to facilitate AI/ML "some day". It is a long route and most call that work "boiling the sea" in respect to minimal viable solutions, so I would come and listen, if you reach a critical mass of 10+ attendees. Are you able to estimate number of participants?

Viele Grüße,

Henk
On July 16, 2017 8:00:51 PM GMT+02:00, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com<mailto:jiangsheng@huawei.com>> wrote:

I am trying set up a meeting place for Tuesday (July 18th) morning 8am~9am, will send the meeting room information later to these who expressed their interests for on-site meeting directly, including these who preferred Thursday morning. If there are any people would like to join, please contact me before the meeting time.

Regards,

Sheng

Hi, all,

Although there was a few efforts to organize AI-relevant works in IETF/IRTF, so far we have not convergent on a solid common interest area that some of us could start to work together towards some-level of standardization. Let’s try again with a smaller scope. We would like to call interests on applying AI/ML into NETWORK MANAGEMENT. The target would be to have a dedicated session to discuss AI-based network management in the NMRG in IETF100 or IETF101.

I am trying set up a meeting place for Tuesday or Thursday before the morning session. These who are interested please send me an email with your preferred day. I will send the information later to on-site participants who expressed interests directly. Giving that the meetecho is only for formal WG/RG meetings, I am afraid it is almost impossible for remote participant. In the past, we did use webex. But the quality is bad without professional meeting equipment. It was bad to bridge four people on site with one remote participant.

Regards,

Sheng

________________________________

IDNET mailing list
IDNET@ietf.org<mailto:IDNET@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idnet

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.