clarification
Deborah Estrin <estrin@usc.edu> Fri, 17 April 1992 21:08 UTC
Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02405;
17 Apr 92 17:08 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07335;
17 Apr 92 17:12 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07331;
17 Apr 92 17:12 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa19181;
17 Apr 92 16:51 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa19177; 17 Apr 92 16:49 EDT
Received: from usc.edu by BBN.COM id aa09957; 17 Apr 92 16:52 EDT
Received: from caldera.usc.edu by usc.edu (5.64+/SMI-3.0DEV3) id AA27871;
Fri, 17 Apr 92 13:52:16 PDT
Received: by caldera.usc.edu (4.1/SMI-3.0DEV3) id AA28557;
Fri, 17 Apr 92 13:52:16 PDT
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 92 13:52:16 PDT
Message-Id: <9204172052.AA28557@caldera.usc.edu>
From: Deborah Estrin <estrin@usc.edu>
Sender: estrin%caldera.usc.edu@usc.edu
To: iab@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu, irsg@isi.edu
Cc: idpr-wg@bbn.com
Subject: clarification
Reply-To: estrin@usc.edu
1. I did not intende to remove IESG from my distribution; i was tired and read it as IETF and thought Noel was openning things up a bit too far :} My mistake 2. I did not consider the IDPR development completely open although I remember that being for manageabilty and getting something done...and I dont remember saying no to anyone who wanted to participate...but that is just memory... 3. As I said in my message, design decisions made a long time ago do not have some kind of "tenure"/seniority. It is appropriate to do another round of study on this, in my opinion, precisely because we learned something by forging ahead at that time. I do not see this as backing off or stepping backwards, i see it as the right way to move forward. D.
- clarification Deborah Estrin