IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IDPR as a Proposed Standard

Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> Thu, 16 April 1992 20:33 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04052; 16 Apr 92 16:33 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27606; 16 Apr 92 16:37 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27602; 16 Apr 92 16:36 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa14651; 16 Apr 92 16:18 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa14647; 16 Apr 92 16:16 EDT
Received: from GINGER.LCS.MIT.EDU by BBN.COM id aa24014; 16 Apr 92 16:19 EDT
Received: by ginger.lcs.mit.edu id AA13057; Thu, 16 Apr 92 16:18:57 -0400
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 92 16:18:57 -0400
From: Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <9204162018.AA13057@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
To: iab@isi.edu, iesg@nri.reston.va.us, yakov@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: IDPR as a Proposed Standard
Cc: idpr-wg@bbn.com, jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu

	Yakov, IDPR was on the agenda for today's IESG meeting before the
latest round of messages. It's pointless to object that the IESG and IAB are
being brought into this 'without proper briefing and enough background'. They
are already involved, because of the extreme volatility of this issue.

	Noel

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email