IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IDPR as a Proposed Standard

Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> Mon, 27 April 1992 17:49 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03305; 27 Apr 92 13:49 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10508; 27 Apr 92 13:53 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10504; 27 Apr 92 13:53 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa18314; 27 Apr 92 13:35 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa18310; 27 Apr 92 13:30 EDT
Received: from GINGER.LCS.MIT.EDU by BBN.COM id aa14294; 27 Apr 92 13:25 EDT
Received: by ginger.lcs.mit.edu id AA02593; Mon, 27 Apr 92 13:25:36 -0400
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 92 13:25:36 -0400
From: Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <9204271725.AA02593@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
To: little@ctt.bellcore.com, yakov@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: IDPR as a Proposed Standard
Cc: iab@isi.edu, idpr-wg@bbn.com, iesg@nri.reston.va.us, jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu

	I think Mike's comments about perspectives and goals put clearly what
I alluded to in a muddy way. The goals of the WG did, I think, have a lot
of impact on the design of the protocol, and particularly some aspects of
the protocol that are now the subject to debate.

	Noel

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email