IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IDPR as a Proposed Standard

"Milo S. Medin" (NASA ARC NSI Project Office) <medin@nsipo.nasa.gov> Mon, 06 April 1992 21:49 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12925; 6 Apr 92 17:49 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29212; 6 Apr 92 17:52 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29208; 6 Apr 92 17:52 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa00437; 6 Apr 92 17:31 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa00433; 6 Apr 92 17:30 EDT
Received: from cincsac.arc.nasa.gov by BBN.COM id aa16121; 6 Apr 92 17:29 EDT
Received: Mon, 6 Apr 92 14:28:54 PDT from localhost.arc.nasa.gov by cincsac.arc.nasa.gov (4.1/1.5T)
Message-Id: <9204062128.AA10165@cincsac.arc.nasa.gov>
To: yakov@watson.ibm.com
Cc: GTS%ZURLVM21@yktvmv.watson.ibm.com, idpr-wg@bbn.com
Subject: Re: IDPR as a Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Apr 92 16:50:11 EDT." <9204062115.AA07299@nsipo.arc.nasa.gov>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 92 14:28:54 -0700
From: "Milo S. Medin" (NASA ARC NSI Project Office) <medin@nsipo.nasa.gov>

Yokov, a quick point.  All the major Fed. backbones have multiple 
interconnects (typically 2) between each other, and typically at the 2
FIX points.  I will agree that as you get lower in the hierarchy, that
there are fewer parallel RD-RD paths, but at the top of the hierarchy,
this is a common, if not essential practice...

					Thanks,
					   Milo

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email