Suggestion for healed partitions.

yakov@watson.ibm.com Fri, 01 May 1992 21:20 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03217; 1 May 92 17:20 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12496; 1 May 92 17:25 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12492; 1 May 92 17:25 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa06984; 1 May 92 17:03 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa06980; 1 May 92 17:02 EDT
Received: from watson.ibm.com by BBN.COM id aa14029; 1 May 92 16:59 EDT
Received: from YKTVMV by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4609; Fri, 01 May 92 16:59:49 EDT
Date: Fri, 1 May 92 16:59:51 EDT
From: yakov@watson.ibm.com
To: woody@sparta.com, idpr-wg@bbn.com
Subject: Suggestion for healed partitions.
Message-ID: <9205011725.aa12492@NRI.Reston.VA.US>

Ref:  Your note of Fri, 1 May 92 16:18:40 -0400

Woody,
I am really confused. I looked at the Internet Draft
version of the protocol spec and I did not find
Section 4.1.3. I also did not find any discussion
on the issues you brought up on page 44 of the Draft.
Can somebody help with this confusion ?
Yakov.