Re: architecture comments - part 2
Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu> Fri, 15 May 1992 21:54 UTC
Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04516;
15 May 92 17:54 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15323;
15 May 92 18:00 EDT
Received: from PIZZA.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15313;
15 May 92 18:00 EDT
Received: from pizza by PIZZA.BBN.COM id aa11197; 15 May 92 17:10 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PIZZA.BBN.COM id aa11191; 15 May 92 17:09 EDT
Received: from GINGER.LCS.MIT.EDU by BBN.COM id aa17585; 15 May 92 17:07 EDT
Received: by ginger.lcs.mit.edu
id AA00163; Fri, 15 May 92 17:07:29 -0400
Date: Fri, 15 May 92 17:07:29 -0400
From: Noel Chiappa <jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <9205152107.AA00163@ginger.lcs.mit.edu>
To: msteenst@bbn.com, yakov@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: architecture comments - part 2
Cc: idpr-wg@bbn.com, jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu
Martha, yes, keep the two documents separate by all means. The spec is too much for the average human who wants to know something about IDPR to plow throught. The pointers sound like a good idea, though. Noel
- architecture comments - part 2 msteenst
- Re: architecture comments - part 2 Noel Chiappa