a few commetns in response to Yakovs note of 4/6

Bob Hinden <Bob.Hinden@eng.sun.com> Fri, 10 April 1992 16:09 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01664; 10 Apr 92 12:09 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16970; 10 Apr 92 12:12 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16966; 10 Apr 92 12:12 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa18283; 10 Apr 92 11:51 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa18279; 10 Apr 92 11:50 EDT
Received: from Sun.COM by BBN.COM id aa27473; 10 Apr 92 11:52 EDT
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag-bb.Corp.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA01874; Fri, 10 Apr 92 08:52:31 PDT
Received: from chestnut.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA29655; Fri, 10 Apr 92 08:52:32 PDT
Received: by chestnut.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00773; Fri, 10 Apr 92 08:51:36 PDT
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 08:51:36 PDT
From: Bob Hinden <Bob.Hinden@eng.sun.com>
Message-Id: <9204101551.AA00773@chestnut.Eng.Sun.COM>
To: estrin@usc.edu
Cc: idpr-wg@bbn.com
In-Reply-To: <9204100511.AA18831@caldera.usc.edu>
Subject: a few commetns in response to Yakovs note of 4/6

 Deborah Estrin writes:

  > c) I am not particularly in favor of going to draft standard right now; i
  > think it should be experimental standard. 

For the record, this discussion is about IDPR going to Proposed Standard.
There are experimental protocols but not experimental standards.

Bob