IETF Logo Mail Archive

comments on the architecture document

yakov@watson.ibm.com Thu, 30 April 1992 14:07 UTC

Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01230; 30 Apr 92 10:07 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15755; 30 Apr 92 10:12 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15743; 30 Apr 92 10:12 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa01197; 30 Apr 92 9:57 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa01191; 30 Apr 92 9:54 EDT
Received: from watson.ibm.com by BBN.COM id aa09781; 30 Apr 92 9:53 EDT
Received: from yktvmz.watson.ibm.com by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0454; Thu, 30 Apr 92 08:08:48 EDT
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 92 08:03:09 EDT
From: yakov@watson.ibm.com
To: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, idpr-wg@bbn.com
Subject: comments on the architecture document
Message-ID: <9204301012.aa15743@NRI.Reston.VA.US>

Ref:  Your note of Thu, 30 Apr 92 01:38:09 -0400

>... I don't recall seeing any protocol bugs pointed out
>in your document.

That should not be viewed as a surprise, given that the
protocol specs dated March 1992 have NEVER been available
to everybody within the WG. Since I did not have
an opportunity to see the specs it would be a major
magic if I would be able to find any bugs.

Yakov.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email