Martha's comments
yakov@watson.ibm.com Tue, 12 May 1992 15:27 UTC
Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23797;
12 May 92 11:27 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14152;
12 May 92 11:32 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14148;
12 May 92 11:32 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa23156;
12 May 92 11:14 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id aa23148; 12 May 92 11:12 EDT
Received: from watson.ibm.com by BBN.COM id aa12531; 12 May 92 11:06 EDT
Received: from YKTVMV by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1124;
Tue, 12 May 92 11:06:26 EDT
Date: Tue, 12 May 92 11:03:50 EDT
From: yakov@watson.ibm.com
To: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, idpr-wg@bbn.com
Subject: Martha's comments
Message-ID: <9205121132.aa14148@NRI.Reston.VA.US>
Noel, > > Thus, while the architecture can provide information about > heterogeneous charging schemes supported by various domains, > the architecture can not realistically support computation > of a minimum cost route unless all the domains throughout > the Internet employ the same charging scheme. > > I think this claim (and some of the preceeeding text) is too >broad to be supportable. Most research in graph theory has concentrated >on algorithms which compute optimal routes to all destinations, not on a >pair-wise basis. I think it would be appropriate to wait until the >research is done on the latter case, and see what results. Also, I >suspect that further research on algorithms which are close to optimal >(probably probabilstic, and thus not guaranteed to be within bounds), but >not optimal, will give us algorithms that are much less expensive than >exponential. In view of your comment I would suggest to modify my proposed text as follows (I marked changes with "|"): "In presence of heterogeneous charging schemes (e.g. cost per byte, cost per packet, cost per session), computation of a minimum cost route requires a priori knowledge by the entity that performs computation of the number of bytes, number of packets and sizes of each packet, and the duration of a session. If all that information is not available, computation of a minimum cost route is impossible. That, but itself, is likely to make computation of a minimum cost route in presence of heterogeneous charging schemes impractical. Even if one assumes that such information is available, the computational complexity of selecting a minimum cost route would be exponential, thus making it impractial for | all, but small internets, unless future research would | be able to come up with new algorithms that have less than | exponential computational complexity. Thus, while the architecture can provide information about heterogeneous charging schemes supported by various domains, the architecture can not realistically support computation of a minimum | cost route unless either all the domains throughout the Internet | employ the same charging scheme, or future research will produce | new algorithms with less than exponential computational complexity." The modifications are intended to explicitly reflect your assertion that there is a probability that future research would be able to come up with algorithms that would have less than exponential complexity. > > > I would suggest you to look at the storage complexity overhead > for IDRP that was published in the April's issue of CCR. > >Is this material available online? Unfortunately no, but I hope you can get access to ACM CCR. If not, let me know and I'll send you a hard copy. Yakov.
- Martha's comments yakov
- Re: Martha's comments Noel Chiappa
- Martha's comments yakov