Re: IDPR as a Proposed Standard

[Deborah Estrin <[e-mail]>]

OK. I think this is largely a communication problem. I interpreted
your remarks in terms of source-demand routing in general, not IDPR in
particular. It sounded to me as if you were arguing that working on a
source-specific routing mechanism was not justified, whereas I thought
we had justified that in several documents. (And maybe I was not the
only one who misinterpreted your comments this way ?)

Now I see (Think) that you are saying you do see the need for this but
have questions about IDPR as an instatiation of it.

If that is the case, and if you are calling for  careful round of
analyzing a design for "version 2 IDPR" or whatever we want to call
it, then I think I agree with you. 

Sorry if I flamed unnecessarily....I thought I was jsut being
"defensive" but now you tell me that there was no "offense" intended :}