comments on the architecture document
yakov@watson.ibm.com Thu, 30 April 1992 14:26 UTC
Received: from nri.nri.reston.va.us by ietf.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01417;
30 Apr 92 10:26 EDT
Received: from nri.reston.va.us by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16837;
30 Apr 92 10:31 EDT
Received: from PARK-STREET.BBN.COM by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16833;
30 Apr 92 10:31 EDT
Received: from park-street by PARK-STREET.bbn.COM id aa01199;
30 Apr 92 9:57 EDT
Received: from BBN.COM by PARK-STREET.BBN.COM id ab01191; 30 Apr 92 9:54 EDT
Received: from watson.ibm.com by BBN.COM id aa09782; 30 Apr 92 9:53 EDT
Received: from yktvmz.watson.ibm.com by watson.ibm.com (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
with BSMTP id 0574; Thu, 30 Apr 92 08:50:39 EDT
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 92 08:49:45 EDT
From: yakov@watson.ibm.com
To: jnc@ginger.lcs.mit.edu, idpr-wg@bbn.com
Subject: comments on the architecture document
Message-ID: <9204301031.aa16833@NRI.Reston.VA.US>
Ref: Your note of Thu, 30 Apr 92 01:38:09 -0400 >The IETF process does not insist on everything being perfect >before going to PS. I am not aiming at making the document perfect. Having a good document should be just fine. However, I certainly object to publishing a document that has any of the following properties: (1) self contradictions (2) one-sided presentations (3) ambiguities (4) claims without factual support (5) technically incorrect statements The comments I made on the Architecture document show that the document has all five of the above properties. The IETF process, as you correctly pointed out, shall not insist on perfect documents. However, it shall insist on documents that are not self-contradicting, don't give one-sided presentations, are unambiguous, don't make unsupported claims, and don't carry technically incorrect statements. Yakov.
- Re: comments on the architecture document Noel Chiappa
- Re: comments on the architecture document Noel Chiappa
- comments on the architecture document Tony Li
- comments on the architecture document yakov
- Re: comments on the architecture document Noel Chiappa
- comments on the architecture document yakov
- comments on the architecture document yakov
- Re: comments on the architecture document Noel Chiappa
- Re: comments on the architecture document Noel Chiappa
- comments on the architecture document yakov
- Re: comments on the architecture document Noel Chiappa
- comments on the architecture document yakov
- Re: comments on the architecture document Noel Chiappa
- comments on the architecture document Robert Woody Woodburn
- comments on the architecture document yakov