an enquiry
Yuko Murayama in Tokyo <murayama@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Wed, 25 November 1992 09:07 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00862; 25 Nov 92 4:07 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00858; 25 Nov 92 4:07 EST
Received: from PIZZA.BBN.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02524; 25 Nov 92 4:08 EST
Received: by PIZZA.BBN.COM id aa17628; 25 Nov 92 4:07 EST
Received: from pizza by PIZZA.BBN.COM id aa17403; 25 Nov 92 3:32 EST
Received: from BBN.COM by PIZZA.BBN.COM id aa17399; 25 Nov 92 3:29 EST
Received: from angora.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp by BBN.COM id aa13965; 25 Nov 92 3:29 EST
Received: from localhost by angora.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (5.65/2.7W-1.2) id AA23845; Wed, 25 Nov 92 17:29:36 +0900
Return-Path: <murayama@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Message-Id: <9211250829.AA23845@angora.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
To: idpr-wg@bbn.com
Cc: motonori@kuis.kyoto-u.ac.jp, sone@hitachi-cable.co.jp, murayama@angora.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Subject: an enquiry
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1992 17:29:36 +0900
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Yuko Murayama in Tokyo <murayama@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
We have a working group of policy routing at WIDE Project, Japan, starting studying IDPR. We have a small policy-routing problem which is termed "the Motonori Problem," because it was first defined clearly by Motonori Nakamura at Kyoto University. The problem is: how can one enforce the preference of transits? Suppose that we have two transit ADs, A and B between the source AD X and the destination AD Y. There are more than one interface (VG) between A and B as follows: Y1 AS Y (destination) | --------------------- | | | AS B | | | ---B1----B2----B3---- | | | |L1 |L2 |L3 | | | ---A1----A2----A3---- | | | AS A | | | --------------------- | X1 AS X (source) When one at AD X wants to send a message to someone at AD Y, how can one say, "packets should go through AD A as much as possible, and pass through B as less as possible due to some cost parameter" ? Does a local route server at X have knowledge on locations of VGs, L1, L2, and L3, so that pakcets from X to Y would take L1? Using BGP one could implement this policy to some extent, but not exactly because, if my memory is correct, B has to advertise each interface with different preference for the sake of A/X...which is not necessarily B's own policy. Yuko
- an enquiry Yuko Murayama in Tokyo
- Re: an enquiry B.Kumar