IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 04 February 2021 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F543A15CB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:38:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4HQhr5qHPQF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:38:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78CE83A15C9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 07:38:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.97.127;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 10:38:23 -0500
Message-ID: <010e01d6fb0b$c5c08970$51419c50$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010F_01D6FAE1.DCEB44C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Adb7C8Tapzr6LUQXS7CFnBh8kC9Npg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210204-6, 02/04/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/--be2B_NtTIGc3mmWMbVjr-1kVI>
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:38:28 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (from
2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021) 

 

This draft defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the

Route Distinguisher ORF (RD-ORF).  RD-ORF is applicable when the

routers do not exchange VPN routing information directly (e.g.

routers in single-domain connect via Route Reflector, or routers in

Option B/Option AB/Option C cross-domain scenario).

 

Please be aware that this draft has one IPR statement attached. 

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4579/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4579/..

 

Please consider the following questions in your review and comments: 

 

1) Will this new ORF filter reduce routing information at key points? 

2) Should the WG consider this draft given it has an IPR claim or 

    Would the IDR WG prefer another approach? 

3) Is this draft ready to be adopted and refined as WG draft? 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email