Re: [Idr] Transport Instance BGP

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 31 July 2020 10:48 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9725D3A1272 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QXSoWcj5m8Kd for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8CF3A104C for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id o18so7637251eds.10 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AYkveQ1UIFamJrE10x0vLprwWqIqhYHHr2S7BDozbMM=; b=a1FDN9RH1p6EgHAvnZjH7em1ehVpAJCQ7uUj5BXr4NtupBxB0c3H5mz0XOVa3gKxgQ DSOdwGtLCv1aqGRbmFqzQXKDVHtYF2LClT/CiaM7V5bMzAssFtgShBvQ5dglKJ9ClRsz YuhwKtFnTaTWDyy/x1Qq80qFOTZbeVq00KegEyl4I+OeDVYl8AIrW1hy0tXkSzYHI2+j LADg4KkLK51Pv41UQndxKjAEakIdppX6VL7H2pHS4Bjg3AyRpjTd9d48xl1yHQCl9oN3 WTDU4N9d+3sd9+IRlQiMz3Z6bAuTljLWpu50Wiw6RuiiY6iRMDpofPmw9P5ptoPBwOKq oqow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AYkveQ1UIFamJrE10x0vLprwWqIqhYHHr2S7BDozbMM=; b=TNYjDXH+9E71RqgQ+PNwL5Vn1r0FZLWg4+150ba4HJjfo+ip+00LZe06LwqvVQR/T6 518jkY/2BBI5UxvF1E0J8ay7a25QKwKbE1L0clmvmOZWow0o8lIlM5PDyASH37opjPtY I4YXAIooeqaKNajy8mltPE/qG/ODyyogGA1qg3+MNgii2q/xhmuUx5lrRkyoGla3bj3F p8kX78pwlDU2XvcXOUNE5fPaPyIiZIKD/ZeAJmeH6pAmqYQtdXnI4PgEJ5GaxnoFaerR qWL3x4utLMm6tdmJ+Xd8jJ7I1cSRIFyfcYy4TCtirDixdVIZdwEnZnBHoE+efayF5jf9 3OqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330ioR/bxDGoJpmqXnvUofDXOrbK0oVwfbOIQYu77wk4BxdJ7Mp MFncwDQsrcJ7TbW1bkj2lrpDnbquNxcP/8NP+0qYLA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRxKm3y/SSt0FK+BjgHgYV/kVOjfS7rfCzRqtwSeIIjg/dbs2bpA/FkjduzLymEU5HeD/gPT2zWcwRHn31BiY=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd14:: with SMTP id i20mr3344023edv.41.1596192533202; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SN6PR13MB23347FC0BC5212B52E62591385750@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMFqFaQ3e6voR-4LyZaAwY2VVX12h_z8tTtJMV+y9KJjyw@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR13MB2334CCDC36A49DC07F05946485720@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHOt+7-suB9Y3cRbC0osM5i+-ueNaGUjfVO3iShUF276Q@mail.gmail.com> <214FC810-D50E-4F48-96AB-0DAB894FBB8A@icloud.com> <CAOj+MMF+61OiddMSp_y2Cq+Fb-YVh4R=7azTRiTnfz3tXazfaQ@mail.gmail.com> <a411014fb097445a8445d5b1b4953de1@huawei.com> <CAOj+MMGqe6694O1yTOPKTyxFBTj208S8-C4ywm=W-vjmfjASPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3LPDLsK2-+eW=vFQOes4bXah-yWjVah5jLSWB+0wR+xg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMHCwDT7q_5FSZeJPENpNwdzZ1xMU6Mr5GUOqMiLuEreag@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV2soMenXnxEtKif17ePBhq244VTXqvv1R5ddMpfFFsdSQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2o8nwgvy2.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2o8nwgvy2.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:48:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEySNspsm+1vcHdwDHd3qeSzgj=Da2YgrkMR55b2zYHug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ef5d0b05abba887c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-BHCwTjaaviTitMuW-V0w4dAtjw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Transport Instance BGP
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:48:57 -0000

Very true ... we could always rename it to "Internet routing related"

In fact this should be win-win for both ... more stable Internet on one
hand and lower bar for new twicks and mangling with BESS like or NETCONF
like insertions to essentially a p2mp path vector protocol.

In fact we see it more and more these days (example SRv6-NP long
discussions) where Internet engineering and stability and close domain
network design and engineering do not align. They are very different and
trying to either stretch one or trim the other what we see in number of
IETF WGs is just not the right thing to do.

One would think that IETF as the name says is about the former ... but if
we see RFCs and drafts maybe just a small percentage of them indicates so.
Almost like the "I" there stands for IP and not Internet ....

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 6:17 AM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > Please review this draft and let Robert and myself know if its something
> > worth reviving.
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raszuk-ti-bgp-01
>
> imiho, there are a lot of things currently called "routing related" i
> would throw on the other side of that wall.
>
> randy
>