Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Mon, 31 October 2016 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10505129B14 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xg3qCXKyMoBj for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A44A1129B49 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p190so172218701wmp.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+JWsk1nadfy7OaKXjfspcdWSHTgMeN1xJclLrQOCLAg=; b=Rj0Jty2zVWZ1xrjhZW0yX1DjCTPpcuLKmxr5YdU/0nx2kGG9AnOg46Nie0nMpEb6zH Gfv2i8Rj0ORgZLRsVr2Lr0Q/TyBGKl0hW/bESIwQG37U6U/bz+3FbsokACW9yDZUPj6F gmYmuuO6uyWj/yNUsp6BKJRLPHQwnqfYnXg6th2Iop6zKWd+UW8ZgNVuBugUK06I6Dmt L31KDAvkVUBXL++4grZiXvVgq3GdAI7fHvRZR56Nljeo6K4afZ4220pp2svsCsuVqrPP LfE4bD8yCjEFRJV4GCTL8U51XQHy0kbaS1j1HGP5AckHc4BB5QQOcW+yXS94HgcbbFfW LAEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+JWsk1nadfy7OaKXjfspcdWSHTgMeN1xJclLrQOCLAg=; b=EgZ+dzRjB/aQLDQ3+/kXFjNpXvc9r2HOfINL/xjwkYQqaT1FAmjluM4k7yM2HMC1nG Ir+VL1hIVc7cwM1U8mc9Q3m4NhhJvPPF001HlgADYLEWAd++k8swpL80crD5W6L0QbOf StAgnfbxM7bDcoIV5o9DOnBJFGlqaLzrERBgijG9PjxpwIV7Kcj9UVxyx7HhRKE2q0+W Oky7XCSlvNWAyjSgJ50CZ+7d2HivQSkAFh4040GYfUjSc2Y7gEcYM/4WoI92r8nlD5Zx bOT4Rq8s73ua/3IgJn0DJSuFIIenv8NnxPUHRsOvgRpBtOC+sxIPM7jZBsKqTof5OMZA KexQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcOArYV1gtyjt5wnC6r3GOeODBQn4c+RDWEf7OBEArFxfwKyJiYc71Op+iNLlgb7Vgb/xqqKM/QiRyiWQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.78.195 with SMTP id d3mr23251969wjx.96.1477949349203; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.197.132 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <169A4C1A-302E-4FE0-841A-ADA63E812E1F@juniper.net>
References: <169A4C1A-302E-4FE0-841A-ADA63E812E1F@juniper.net>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:29:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH1iCirDyMnxz=8BLo8-mzUO2zJvtzfVYetM+h0BKgx_4=o3Ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: "John G.Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd0010f4939e05402fe50b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-QdstMC9sOK3nMcp2_TOV5vrFmk>
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:29:32 -0000

I support adoption.

IMHO, the primary reasons are for the ability of operators and vendors to
identify occurrences "in the wild", and to be able identify their status as
"deprecated" as well as to possibly provide mechanisms for stripping them
when seen and/or notifying sending operators.

I am willing to review and comment once adopted.

Brian

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 2:18 PM, John G.Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> The author has asked for the WG to adopt  draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-
> 30-31-129.
>
> If you support or oppose adoption please reply indicating so. Reasons for
> your position are helpful, as volunteering to review, comment, and/or
> shepherd. As an aside, I will note that I don't think the WG has the option
> of doing nothing, so if you oppose adoption please address what you think
> should be done instead.
>
> The adoption call will end November 13.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --John
>
> P.S.: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-
> 30-31-129-01
>
> Abstract
>
>    This document requests IANA to deprecate the following BGP path
>    attributes values: 30, 31 and 129.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>