Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41300120071 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 23:40:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lFcxFymlv9Ff for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 23:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E988F12006E for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 23:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8C0B365352DB9D9390EB for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:40:02 +0100 (IST) Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:40:01 +0100 Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.2]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 14:39:55 +0800 From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" To: Susan Hares , 'idr wg' Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019) Thread-Index: AdWCvtFpBLL09mJXRVKaSdG0p0gs7gJB5+Xw Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 06:39:54 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD2DA691@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <015d01d582c4$388e04d0$a9aa0e70$@ndzh.com> In-Reply-To: <015d01d582c4$388e04d0$a9aa0e70$@ndzh.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD2DA691NKGEML515MBSchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019) X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 06:40:10 -0000 --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD2DA691NKGEML515MBSchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I've read the latest version of this draft and think it is a good starting = point for the distribution of routing policies using BGP. Thus I support th= e adoption of this document. Best regards, Jie From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 3:19 AM To: 'idr wg' Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 t= o 10/28/2019) This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt (10/14 to 10/28/2019). You can access the draft at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/ In your discussion regarding this draft consider if: 1) Passing extended policy in BGP is useful, 2) Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound mechanis= m, 3) A deployment need exists for this technology. Susan Hares Co-chair and shepherd --_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD2DA691NKGEML515MBSchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

I’ve read the latest version of this draft and think it is = a good starting point for the distribution of routing policies using BGP. T= hus I support the adoption of this document.

 

Best regards,

Jie

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 3:19 AM
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (= 10/14 to 10/28/2019)

 

This begins a 2 week WG adoptio= n call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt

(10/14 to 10/28/2019).  Yo= u can access the draft at:

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/d= raft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/

 

In your discussion regarding th= is draft consider if:

 

1) &nbs= p;    Passing extended policy= in BGP  is useful,

2) &nbs= p;    Passing policy in wide = community atom is a technical sound mechanism,

3) &nbs= p;    A deployment need exist= s for this technology.

 

 

Susan Hares

Co-chair and shepherd

--_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD2DA691NKGEML515MBSchi_--