IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 19 November 2021 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AE63A07D8; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:30:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id viMl5Qxu_Tmx; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:30:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4697A3A07FF; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:29:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id t5so45284460edd.0; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:29:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0SOSXkuXU7tOqxLWznTpelXW3kWMek/3xRB0v+bGcKk=; b=JHA/91UZ2LL5GfmBAlkNLgiyDa1Bo5UHd2OwVl3HPYRTFZ1FMQZ62SCM/nX2Ry00fX TWxoaEwN2I9ftcsZ5oF+XMvX2dOH7x7G3YPlTvgTupx45/LPeNjdLmmtvinT+i61lelP UVX7Zndw74/Fh00tMMBqjoK7VN31MVzwiWcqbA+zZ57bt2fmcXiP/Q71H9j7313F4xc9 TRVLVngHruke7LrvQy0D5DtYZlZe9oxB2Q1BYNInnkA26zjSU6f60FF7SagKDFcMM07N bKrZ8rXliumpfj8k2kJq3HtIiNDCamqRKswseQuKgClGc8G3ECUPTi7HnPPadBITpyxw so1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0SOSXkuXU7tOqxLWznTpelXW3kWMek/3xRB0v+bGcKk=; b=sb8Szp3JGWRuwXW1nrCKycFUGWcpf76q2fijrK+0U+x2Vx/kKkTfw8INJmbQzctcsa fpnaY3G/abAGYC7OYoCPWZSExX7woKm+a/tMSVYFIhohrlfeFPygssvOiH7eNN2vxT6p +OZRKZiuLc58c0Mgz7rGwNeEXYOYbH/i/Pmdd3OIjHtoSlRoVwZzDMjtJ6/EpEaT2uzu KlbKL/28ca4gbwObPJEIDCLJzCHpg2+Z7vWxwxUoHZuQWQhYqS4Pnc8MTuNnHJ9lAYsj wnOgupJtE6ZX1pRhJYwZt5XLw7Lxc/VeOJuhh9WT+df8yAiQXqxAepCNc8/CzBgjrUOL f2wQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bxrehjaX313DmYSsGyxD4NXdJGH7Gxtzqx1WM/rcvxYdAD620 SbXPbkKXZecTOcRZfqedfyH4jEdrjAHFVML14VQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHwsk0jMdN7B9jni0JGIEzcGOT9XyX7KvjX1e8MJ+lPSLLAbytHgHAYyH4PA1cY7ZLr1oMcegoGkTi2wTL++E=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a0d7:: with SMTP id bh23mr9667292ejb.82.1637339391471; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:29:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:29:50 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <163728135496.9938.10094382108043241203@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <163728135496.9938.10094382108043241203@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:29:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxAVZGw9GwccuSh=X3yscFzruqHEhRXPjCgkJJXkALk2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-ym0hEZBsMZDcKW9fjUGaITsip0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-03: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:30:05 -0000

On November 18, 2021 at 7:22:36 PM, Martin Vigoureux wrote:


Martin:

Hi!

Thanks for the review!


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your work.
> Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but why doesn't this document update
> 8955 just like it updates 7153? I'm asking because your document modifies the
> allocation policy of the 0x80-0x8F range, as well as the names of 0x80, 0x81,
> 0x82 (and of their sub-types registries), and at the same time it seems to me
> that 7153 covers the allocation policy of the 0x80-0x8F range but only 0x80
> (and its sub-type registry), while it's 8955 which seems to cover 0x81 and
> 0x82 (and their sub-types registries).

rfc8955 inherited the references to the registries by Obsoleting
rfc7674 and rfc5575.  I didn't think at the time that we needed an
Update, but I see your point and have no objection to adding rfc8955
to the Updated list.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email