IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 13 October 2018 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D65B130E45 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 09:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPjjoeGdW6-k for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 09:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7EC2130E3C for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 09:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w9DGqPg1000650 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:52:25 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA9022044 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:52:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8595B22042 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:52:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (4.43.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.43.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w9DGqOAQ028540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:52:25 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:52:23 +0100
Message-ID: <017601d46315$1da03a50$58e0aef0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdRjExCdekZNTjZsT1KJFQTuCJR/PA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.114.43.4
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24154.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.752-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.752-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24154.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.752000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Vag+r/h5ShTkCW/ps4p3MXBRIrj8R47FQPCWRE0Lo8LdeAKnvBMxfFiA FgKkd7tVSNzKPpEGGoO3B5G+wf8YthFniU+KOwVc5gCHftmwEMJ9LQinZ4QefL6qvLNjDYTwC+C mxfKmwAwUGm4zriL0oQtuKBGekqUpbGVEmIfjf3vDmWHSOM0zBDP+O4Y4qBUV7HEZsjIJUC9vdM qFz9SnmDxQqXSSpxmnuet5r9Bdhvd06cjxY8Ylm1csa0AGV/SbwvwdumFAO/g=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/0-l14VhpIzBkIsSbbtRgqht1MdY>
Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 16:52:29 -0000

Hey all,

Did we all give up on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe?

I see from the datatracker that the document completed WG last call with
consensus. 
The datatracker says "Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WG, Doc Shepherd
Follow-up Underway"

Does someone need to prod this along?

Thanks,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email