Re: [Idr] draft-ymbk-idr-rs-bfd and idr-bgp-bestpath-selection ??

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 12 February 2015 03:56 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94BE1A8A79 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:56:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-oiz7hZdDCY for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:56:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B9B41A8A9A for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:56:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1YLksp-0004Ku-CZ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:56:08 +0000
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:56:04 +0700
Message-ID: <m28ug3srzf.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D100E2C9.265A27%rajiva@cisco.com>
References: <D100E2C9.265A27%rajiva@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/068eH_b5kaCRC7UT9fD1zu3YOXM>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ymbk-idr-rs-bfd and idr-bgp-bestpath-selection ??
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:56:14 -0000

> Does draft-ymbk-idr-rs-bfd benefit from best path selection criteria
> enhancement (wrt NH resolvability) described here?
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-06

perhaps you could describe how it might benefit?

randy