[Idr] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 14 February 2017 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F6512948B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:40:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PVUG8vwaejFO for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6361129404 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:40:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.36.173.13;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22B8B51@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22B8B51@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:35:45 -0500
Message-ID: <001201d2865a$48899340$d99cb9c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLSbtDTPbaPFkju+g7Ymnrg910vup9n1jZA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/0YWFRtx45eIlsfvGHrZ5P_pH4NA>
Subject: [Idr] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:40:47 -0000

IDR WG: 

The OPSAWG chairs are reviewing the
draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02.txt for WG adoption.  Please comment
on this OPSAWG list and/or IDR list if you feel this draft should be adopted
on not adopted. 

Sue Hares 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tianran Zhou [mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 10:57 PM
To: Susan Hares
Subject: FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Hi Sue,

The OPSAWG is polling for adoption of the I-D
(draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02), which I think is highly related to
IDR WG.
Could you kindly please forward this to IDR to see if there is any comment
and opinion on the WG adoption?

Best Regards,
Tianran Zhou, OPSAWG Co-Chair 

-----Original Message-----
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for
draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Dear OPSAWG,

In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE
extension draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would
like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should
be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.

Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by
Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or
implement or deploy the extension described in the document.

Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our
IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or
have serious objections (with explanation of course).

Regards,
Tianran

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg