Re: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02: (with COMMENT)
"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 15:48 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFE612962D; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:48:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HSjT8zqcCrCF; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CC00129579; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:48:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6960; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1483458496; x=1484668096; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=GuPiFvBzUDTdXwiiso8L1gGzsj4TORJRibn8ghAl3tI=; b=SuRVufFlPxb51RGeCad98ILQZQuqpcv2BL922WZtAhWAncvBE7cZUJlz ArT6PfyUKnL/+o7ojVFZayUUTdC2OYeW6KIokkBRwxOQxgN0bn8XGILPE 90HNfTVVqGJlVmhjVetD8VZXiqDBxqKgIvxRoksU05Jt07Nq4In/fXGPE A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A9AQALx2tY/5FdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgnE5DQEBAQEBH1+BDAeNUKQ5gxmCD4IIKoV4AhqBLT8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaQYjVhACAQg/AwICAjAUEQIEAQ0FiHAOrmyCJSuKFwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFhkWCAoJfh0otgjAFlQmFdAGGU4pqkFWSPAEfOIEqPAGFTnKHMYENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,455,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="367202368"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jan 2017 15:48:15 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v03FmFTo006017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:48:15 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:48:15 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:48:14 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Joel Jaeggli's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSZKL+ybZvtQFHH0KPZGD34kRhsqEm+RMA
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:48:14 +0000
Message-ID: <BFECD3D5-45E2-45AC-B393-DAED2F0BC55B@cisco.com>
References: <148332543492.25163.10499443805665312317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148332543492.25163.10499443805665312317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BFECD3D545E245ACB393DAED2F0BC55Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/11r-ieXmDBjPvCNG4z_Y9WyPnXA>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:48:18 -0000
Joel: Hi! Yes, there’s been plenty of discussion in the WG…one of the proposals is define experimental path attributes; pointing at this just because it was discussed in Korea: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-haas-idr-extended-experimental-00 Thanks! Alvaro. On 1/1/17, 9:50 PM, "Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@bogus.com<mailto:joelja@bogus.com>> wrote: Imho, while we're not doing it here, we should probably provide advice to implementers or even revisit how we allocate them on how to do this safely in the future cause squatting on code points is definite minefield here.
- [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-deprec… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's Yes on draft-ietf-idr-de… Alvaro Retana (aretana)