IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Tue, 23 October 2018 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A45130DEE; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qkL5f49Ae4t4; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9004130E4B; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id AD5D1E6B99EC3; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 03:28:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 03:28:36 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.120]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:28:26 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis
Thread-Index: AQHUW8vheWSmJxAfGUyel8svG2H5AqUOwJ6AgAEYiACAFGSDgIAH+ZpQ
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 02:28:27 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C2B8912B@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <20180712185855.GQ12853@pfrc.org> <46D2DE8D-F552-444B-82C8-46DF301B1D10@tix.at> <20181004162737.GD17157@pfrc.org> <06EA9BDF-14C4-494B-AB5C-8C5264A10317@tix.at> <BA4ED40A-CD5D-4766-8610-61BF90345A8E@tix.at>
In-Reply-To: <BA4ED40A-CD5D-4766-8610-61BF90345A8E@tix.at>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C2B8912BNKGEML515MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/1Ir2Nw-1mNvfwAut_3dNOR5WT7o>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 02:28:42 -0000

Hi Christoph,

We are building the agenda for the upcoming interim meeting.

Could you let us know whether you need a time slot in the interim to present the update on 5575-bis and discuss the remained issues?

Best regards,
Jie

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Loibl
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 4:37 PM
To: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis

Hi,

On 05.10.2018, at 11:11, Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at<mailto:c@tix.at>> wrote:

I will upload a new version repairing the minor issues you pointed out (see the previous Email in this thread -  if I see no objections on the list). At the same time I am not changing any of the other aspects (discussed in this Email) until we have a rough idea where we are heading for.

As promised, I uploaded a new version of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis (-09) that addresses most of the minor issues pointed out by Jeffery in a way posted on the list earlier. Issues that seem to need more discussions have not been addressed by this new version (I may make a short presentation on that in the interim next week).

Please look into the changes on datatracker:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/

Cheers Christoph

--
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at<mailto:c@tix.at> | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email