IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

"Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat)" <pmohapat@cisco.com> Wed, 05 December 2012 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <pmohapat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100F821F892F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:11:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OsX1Y7HgGJ7u for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4429421F8CCC for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:11:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=485; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1354745484; x=1355955084; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=eXQGoMJJnwIsbW8PZHSVHqQbOFG5D+1RVLzQX/2uULk=; b=BOfRRCeDCBRTAnjecnxjZIBW1MYiSRgyQsIm15fwEHZOPP6GuenqIf2n hhGcL6TosgHvHw/tnMlzEs2OQCZ3C4fF1PzgcP6pFimG6gIsbKvssSHfF RB3EEE7O6JaDhk6XLkhIgakSLF9ecceZAytkURq4yroFZeI18Njiyd4mL g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EADTFv1CtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABEviQWc4IgAQQ6PxIBCCIUQiUCBA4NiAjCXZAXYQOmSoJygiE
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6917"; a="149837675"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2012 22:11:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB5MBNeq000739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:11:23 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.110]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:11:23 -0600
From: "Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat)" <pmohapat@cisco.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
Thread-Index: AQHNza+ASu61tTboPkC+faw5xeSRvpgBaZKAgAADxACACXARAIAANteAgAAJCgD//4ltAIAAh+YA//97EYCAAIfZAP//fH6A
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:11:22 +0000
Message-ID: <C6C16AE3B7961044B04A1BCEC6E2F93603D12BF7@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERno1ie59bEN5+tXopi8y4e+s+wKZfwNGyVtq2ZNSAr9EA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
x-originating-ip: [10.155.33.251]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3CCEE7C631E052488FD125071E84331A@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>, Tony Tauber <ttauber@1-4-5.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:11:31 -0000

>I think mixing Internet routing with L3VPNs with DCs etc .. in this
>discussion is completely not that much helpful.


??


>Likewise if we go the path to mandate listing concerns and various
>deployment scenarios the odds that this document will proceed is quite
>low.
>
>IMO this document should just reserve the new private AS space leaving
>all other aspects of it's use to the autonomy and freedom of local
>operators.


Thank you for your opinion.

- Pradosh

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status