Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16)

I’d like to reiterate my support as co-author.
With RFC 7883 and RFC 7884 published this is the last step.

Cheers,
Jeff
On Nov 2, 2020, 5:07 AM -0800, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, wrote:
> Hi Sue, IDR WG,
> I support publication. The encodings are consistent with RFC 7883 and RFC 7884.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
> Date: Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 9:45 PM
> To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16)
>
> This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16).
> This is the second WG LC call since the initial call had only 1 reponse besides the authors.
>
> You can access the draft at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions/
>
> We have a report of draft has 1 implementation from Nokia:
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions%20implementations
>
> We are missing IPR statements from Sam Aldrin and Greg Minsky.
> The co-authors should encourage these authors to submit IPR statements
> by Tuesday (11/3/2020).
>
> In your responses please consider the following questions:
> a) Do you know any issues with this technology?
> b) Will this technology help BGP-LS deployments?
> c) Is this draft ready for publication?
>
> If you know of any additional implementations, please
> send email to the WG chairs or respond to this email
> with the information.
>
> Cheers, Susan Hares
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr