Re: [Idr] draft-ymbk-sidrops-rov-no-rr

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 15 November 2021 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7329B3A08FF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:05:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0zgiAV7MIG2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13EB73A0983 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1mmhIZ-0008Dq-CH; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:05:47 +0000
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:05:46 -0800
Message-ID: <m2pmr1s0hh.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Interminable Discussion Room <idr@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMG1NDa6aZgETzsqMYOKNv4sfQUWx6w=OCfi+V=yPTY3zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1mmcrF-0007bA-27@ran.psg.com> <m28rxptrw8.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAOj+MMHUZ26KTQje5ZO0wVubHMfvvb3QwZZm_x+TmTpTChdUdw@mail.gmail.com> <YZKpVnY/EORywfIQ@Space.Net> <CAOj+MMF+2rg69pLzR=xuK=yRKwKr1ochSzfOgYmV2-e5amZOgw@mail.gmail.com> <YZKrRx8G5SroAZ0v@Space.Net> <m2sfvxs0zd.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAOj+MMG1NDa6aZgETzsqMYOKNv4sfQUWx6w=OCfi+V=yPTY3zQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/1cyc8XAeI3e6rLORWw288SHQJnY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ymbk-sidrops-rov-no-rr
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:06:04 -0000

> Maybe instead of messing up with Adj-RIB-In selective state to be kept we
> could just suppress Route Refresh Requests when triggered by RPKI
> updates to a much less conservative interval ?
> 
> Would that not solve the issue ?

no, changing the granularity of stupidity does not amke it smart.  my
dozen peers at the IX will still be pissed off and i will still get
large spikes when they answer my rr reqs.