[Idr] Status update for IDR

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 07 June 2021 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E0B3A1663 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 06:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OarCAREhai0h for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 06:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5983A165F for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 06:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.25.176.237;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 09:32:48 -0400
Message-ID: <00a001d75ba1$9bd63cd0$d382b670$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A1_01D75B80.14C5D550"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AddboXFj+kGzGLueQui51P3wI/LXow==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210607-0, 06/06/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/1uPfP_7b5BzvHXEn9uJLhAid6Qk>
Subject: [Idr] Status update for IDR
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 13:32:59 -0000

Please let me know if I missed anything. 

Sue

----------

Full status at: 

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/idr-draft-status

 

NG-IDR interims:  10-12:00 ET, 16-18 CET,  22-24 Beijing 

6/7/2021:  Flow specification v1 or Flow Specification v2 

6/21/2021:  BGP Auto-Configuration Requirements

 

At RFC editor: 

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03 (Auth-48) 

draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-09

 

IESG approved: 

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-15

draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-15

 

at IESG (Post IETF LC) 

draft-ietf-optimal-route reflection-22

 

At AD review: 

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-15

draft-ietf-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-05

draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-06 

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-06 

 

WG LC approved: 

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01.txt 

  

WG adoption calls (in April) 

draft-heitz-idr-wklc-01.txt [not approved] 

 

WG LC pending 

1) draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy (holding on spring) 

2) draft-ietf-idr-RFC7752bis (on hold pending discussion) 

3) draft-ietf-idr-rpd-10.txt 

[These WG Adoption calls will have IPR calls] 

 

 

WG adoption calls requested (6/7/2021] 

1. draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-edge-discovery 

2. draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6-05.txt 

3. draft-wang-idr-bgp-ifit-capabilities    

4. draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-06.txt 

[These WG Adoption calls will have shepherd reviews this week and IPR calls.


Adoption calls will start after shepherd review + IPR calls are complete] 

 

Shepherd reviews will include discussion of: 

1. List discussion on draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6 on encoding 

[Huaimo Chen, Robin Lee and Joel Halpern - required participants] 

 

 

2. draft-wang-idr-bgp-ifit-capabilities - awaiting list discussion on two
points:  

a) Why BGP - instead of BGP-LS or netconf/yang? 

b) How is scoped limited on Extended Communities 


3. RFC7752bis - should we expand the scope or send to WG LC? 

 

Please send the idr@ietf.org any comments on these topics prior to 6/11.