IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 12 December 2012 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A48021F88F8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:11:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UsksRZ7NcI0j for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ia0-f172.google.com (mail-ia0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2904121F88CA for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:11:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z13so1103268iaz.31 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:11:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/kNxfJYimMxM7+HPBXT/Sv6qkYQF9XMrhH9SutQJutw=; b=WHuB0AV3rxOS4D20/w6S2crCvL0f1FouVqpk48UWoYBaKURsU5WPzsC3+iFR7t2KL7 BBofqUSJbLm4X+2ZaMWF46xVdhtjzNGwR4oTqhCtibjhW+pVWz17lEPWj/EjsW3DhvHd M1Gmp8eOna05griwWI/iv0957oVBKpJ2upWSmS7JIcVvSrWgDp5kXZvhdEdndovABB29 obIkSaaUI1zbMpu0h4g5Is+a6CRqSrF7G7dQtH3l80wAQPAOOg3n9jtj4lXdx0TafKsM uF5ZN1M9sLuo741Yz1/K6kbAlzh8PaD7Br6tFdtVbLG146y86Cc9QPVgAzsjnM2iKzoh +8cA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.57.133 with SMTP id i5mr1550816igq.67.1355332306813; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.135.100 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:11:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <06401C9C-8895-4BDA-8FE3-6B06DF55D2A2@kumari.net>
References: <CA+b+ERnuWZ+r2O-eFhe3hU00uoU4UKnRcbhLNVXU7p5+DjoWbQ@mail.gmail.com> <C6C16AE3B7961044B04A1BCEC6E2F93603D12A0C@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <20121210225858.GC24937@puck.nether.net> <m2d2yh32cw.wl%randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERnSVvewSpftXs3FhW12-S+sgnB1SwD4L+xqFW+hhbQayw@mail.gmail.com> <m2ip871q5r.wl%randy@psg.com> <9ABE0240-8468-4884-ABDE-4A884D21F5DB@tony.li> <06401C9C-8895-4BDA-8FE3-6B06DF55D2A2@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:11:46 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: EApNeKVIBNikDqyy13g2Q-TqCXc
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkTLjw_93SD+bztL4Syvn_jV045WkiZr6U1h4Ei2wh5ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:11:49 -0000

Yes ... a simple reference to RFC1930/BCP6 should be sufficient.
Unless this is no longer BCP and if so let's discuss why not.

Regs,
R.

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 12, 2012, at 3:11 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> I think Jon should remove any use case examples from the draft as
>>>> there is no way one could enforce that the new range will _only_ be
>>>> used in those use cases.
>>>
>>> if there is no documented motivation for it, then we don't need the
>>> draft at all.  simplifies live greatly.  great idea.  ;~>
>>
>>
>> Then we lard up every draft with marketing material.  Is that better?
>
> Nope, no-one is suggesting marketing material -- but I think having *some* mention of a use case / justification is needed to readers can evaluate if the idea is worth the time / risk.
>
> Providing instructions on how to build a little wooden platform with strong spring held back by a bent piece of metal that you can attach bits of curdled dairy makes no sense unless you explain that this will help solve their mouse problem...
>
> W
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idr mailing list
>> Idr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>>
>
> --
> Eagles soar but a weasel will never get sucked into a jet engine
>
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status