Re: [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 17:30 UTC

From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUmGlLSERhDAWJJ0WFZ8gv2kkz36WH4jug
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:29:58 +0000
Message-ID: <5f986401cb8b452baec8ef0cb6f2a4b3@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <154531310713.19045.18561963306070264.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154531310713.19045.18561963306070264.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/28NxWtCgCQ0MHzw2WYJUjjdfc1o>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Martin -

V18 has been uploaded and I believe it addresses all of the editorial issues you identified.
Thanx very much for catching these.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 5:38 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>;
> aretana.ietf@gmail.com; idr-chairs@ietf.org; shares@ndzh.com; idr@ietf.org
> Subject: Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hello,
> 
> thank you for this document.
> I only have caught nits.
> 
> Abstract:
> s/Traffic Engineering Extensions/Traffic Engineering Metric Extensions/
> 
> To have a naming consistent with your references I'd do,
> in section 2 and in IANA Section:
> s/1120              Unidirectional Bandwidth Utilization/1120
> Unidirectional Utilized Bandwidth/ and in Section 2.8: s/| Unidirectional
> Bandwidth Utilization  |   39     |     33         |/| Unidirectional Utilized
> Bandwidth  |   39     |     33         |/
> 
> Not all figures are numbered. Either have numbering for all or for none. Since
> you never reference them, maybe you don't need numbering. But if you
> keep it
> then:
>    where:
>                                  Figure X
>    Type: xxxx
> 
> should become:
>                                  Figure X
>    where:
>    Type: xxxx
>

[Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ie… Martin Vigoureux
Re: [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)