Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 12 February 2021 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DE53A17EE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:19:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.347
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwfWLBRXdDYe for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:19:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373603A17ED for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:19:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.97.127;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:19:47 -0500
Message-ID: <015601d70163$43fe2c40$cbfa84c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0157_01D70139.5B28E790"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdcBYQ0U9J8QqZaoR3eHcYVTqCdI3w==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210211-4, 02/11/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/2KjgEO21hnKUdLcxxQ_7w-KmrMs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:19:56 -0000

Greetings: 

 

The following in this discussion we do not have consensus on: 

 

a) the problem this draft is drafting to solve relating to BGP routes, 

b) the need for additional mechanisms to solve the problem, 

c) a clear description of the technology to solve the problem. 

 

It is difficult to do (b) and (c) without a consensus on the problem.  Since
this is the 2nd time this draft has gone up for adoption, the co-chairs are
considering the input from the list and will provide some suggestions to the
authors.   

 

The authors and those who are making comments on this draft are welcome to
continue discussing the topic on-list.   

 

A big thanks to the operators who have shared their view of the need for the
technology and to all IDR members who have recalled that "clear speech and
kindness can go together".  

 

Cheers, Sue