Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17] - consensus adopted

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 20 November 2019 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4DA1202A0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:28:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FgiFULDIU7sQ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A99612023E for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xAK3Sqiv007812; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:28:52 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E79122044; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:28:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B2122042; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:28:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (dhcp-918f.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.145.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xAK3SnxW016589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:28:51 GMT
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Susan Hares'" <shares@ndzh.com>, <idr@ietf.org>
References: <013b01d59dcc$9b1d1000$d1573000$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <013b01d59dcc$9b1d1000$d1573000$@ndzh.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:28:49 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <0a9801d59f52$a107b830$e3172890$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0A99_01D59F52.A109DB10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQI5DtLGzc3vRoVDbCmMbHzjsfGaG6bMhu6w
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 31.133.145.143
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25054.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.793-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--21.793-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25054.004
X-TMASE-Result: 10--21.793200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: hwsFDxVJcFlor4mPA3EMtjYTypjB3iDVaMmm586o4gBi0lpUl7/AsSr0 /UW14CJVKIra+veulC5OY1K1NZTCvR8tmNEYF19Bj0drvddoWETg02I3oyGU8Gquw69QUQrLG0Z V9a36VW8uaH6MQZitLEo3JyYvHpgBL/fdNahJQfrCtSG/SQAC8YrD60LOxBFvBwZ0IMCNOMEkwf Na2ggqVwI2w7A2KdSJ+Le519qA9a+cjRcjZuZWWYS/TV9k6ppAzqP/yfxANUH+UVve/ZY5tGRWe PusFQaMPkOxCEaJxS5SCQqw/3ZLLK/V8/cgjzjShUy0TABax1ymfHdo5RxuF0Yza41dGqxSsx9U DlVfYMagZek4aBjg9GVQQEn8YqexrDcq9yDepl1OHhVJB+QhXF+BoH4JnCIG1tMhXOTffbDs6EK P6d8Il8xcwKACAKj+v6A5bP3JNm5oai+EYvM3lu9VsdrlGzy3/bFfU5WtaotXG3yI9k2vbIfNL7 D/HMEOxCW4LIIVzgLZPU+b5RcHaHzrWhwAg+mwydRP56yRRA/QTttTsZbKLwNPGPNKJEnBAX0Bh MCVQpfSw8EQWtEiHcYyuV7yWMoDdPcrdWKd4J+YvybQm0otUxq0pobeLLAHB2sT1AxkeqSa5XuG v7mGmhKojAOB9xdWUNDjd2RbdrksMLcUZMcjd4vptQwz5tsi8kp9oxB/3WWSAuAjv0tF/m9wXXE YtUSMeAV+z+V9znIkcwRAhmpFhpcFdomgH0lnFEUknJ/kEl5ZDL1gLmoa/JiPn2g4sHYaYXlfnK 7BOiHSZnojH9YCY7lXFxBLjEtDBJSYb3mTbSsBDX/ymMBTkEeJGe21FEKZ
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/2xDERx-qH1Nc7TLDOjXYqU9dfHY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17] - consensus adopted
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:28:59 -0000

Hi WG,

 

Sorry, got a bit bogged down this week (currently at some sort of conference).

 

I just posted draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00 and I consider there are no further changes needed to the document, but would be happy to hear different form the WG.

 

Adrian

--

Bored with reading Interent-Drafts?

Read some fairy stories for adults of all ages instead.

• Tales from the Wood

• More Tales from the Wood

• Tales from Beyond the Wood

• Tales from the Castle

Get them on line https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/

Or buy a signed copy from me by post

*** Stop me in the corridor at IETF-106 to get a copy ***

 

 

 

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 18 November 2019 04:57
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17] - consensus adopted

 

Idr: 

 

Thank you for all your input on draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt.  This draft is accepted as a IDR WG document, and Adrian should submit this as;

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt  

 

We will start the WG call by Thursday.  Please send any comments to Adrian for incorporation in the document. 

 

Sue Hares 

 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2019 9:22 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt - second call [11/3 to 11/17]

 

Greetings IDR: 

 

The adoption call for  draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt 

was inconclusive.  We had clear support, but just not enough response. 

This is a second WG adoption call. 

 

This draft proposes to refine the instructions for RFC7752 

"Border Gateway Protocol – Link   State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry"

from Designated Expert to  Expert Review.  

 

These are both technical reviews prior to assignments of 

code point or code points in the registry.  

The only difference is instructions for the review. 

 

Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the 

BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments.  

 

John and I anticipate that expert reviews will allow code request for 

BGP-LS quicker response to code requests.  We encourage the WG to 

read and strongly consider this draft. 

 

Cheerily, Sue