Re: [Idr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-scudder-idr-rfc3392-bis-

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Sat, 03 May 2008 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6D63A6997; Sat, 3 May 2008 10:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45FD3A692A for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 May 2008 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rC7B4DPaNSgz for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 May 2008 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from manos.scc.mi.org (manos.scc.mi.org [204.11.140.250]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF0F3A685D for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 May 2008 10:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by manos.scc.mi.org (Postfix, from userid 1025) id A2A174E4BA; Sat, 3 May 2008 13:34:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 13:34:26 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20080503173426.GB23560@scc.mi.org>
References: <200804301333.m3UDX4x97759@magenta.juniper.net> <0B82A4F5-4D76-427B-8CB3-386C0F6A64F2@tcb.net> <ECC75E57-CBCA-4E48-B88F-23442E398F65@bgp.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ECC75E57-CBCA-4E48-B88F-23442E398F65@bgp.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Subject: Re: [Idr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-scudder-idr-rfc3392-bis-
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 05:31:11PM -0400, John G. Scudder wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Danny McPherson wrote:
> > One minor comment..   I think we should rename "Unsupported  
> > Capability"
> > to "Required Capability Missing", and given that the codepoint itself
> > isn't
> > changing, just the descriptor, there should be no issues here.
> 
> Clearly this is OK by me if the WG is happy with it.

I would strongly support this.  I found the original naming very
confusing when working through this in implementation some years ago.
The usual method of consulting the archives only confused matters
further as the feature evolved from capabilities *negotiation* into
advertisement.

-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr