Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 25 April 2017 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977D41279E5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ja0kglDDFGOS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132D81275AB for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 523331E358; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:18:42 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170425221842.GT30063@pfrc.org>
References: <D4E812E8-AA7B-4EA2-A0AC-034AA8922306@juniper.net> <19878_1492639968_58F7E0E0_19878_13298_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CBE742@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170420085755.sbzdtcjhirdoi3b3@hanna.meerval.net> <8442_1492680540_58F87F5C_8442_1101_11_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CBFD43@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8442_1492680540_58F87F5C_8442_1101_11_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CBFD43@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3MeXyqRmklNpWuDggaEZdVW6Uvs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:11:25 -0000

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:28:59AM +0000, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
> Can this document define what he means by "configured export policy".  Possibly by referring to standardized yang models.

Referring to at least the IETF published document:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-01

:   The default policy defined by the model is to reject the route for
:   both import and export policies.

I don't have the openconfig models cached and those are effectively the
working documents, but I doubt this point is likely to have changed.
Perhaps someone doing active work in openconfig can respond to this point.

-- Jeff