IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

john heasley <heas@us.ntt.net> Thu, 11 February 2021 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF113A0D63 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:35:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C1JsPw4wtAR9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4CDF3A0D42 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:35:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 9A5CF200A32; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:35:43 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:35:43 +0000
From: john heasley <heas@us.ntt.net>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <YCWxPzNpExXqTD2u@shrubbery.net>
References: <010e01d6fb0b$c5c08970$51419c50$@ndzh.com> <cbb88a641502401f8410f6674797387a@huawei.com> <CABNhwV1=MO3F1DF5EwEoCj54-Lfhd21jUSivyWDK+ReFrQEU6A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV1=MO3F1DF5EwEoCj54-Lfhd21jUSivyWDK+ReFrQEU6A@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3MvF1RPXxaafkyrnoOO-b5vNQnE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 22:35:47 -0000

Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:46:42AM -0500, Gyan Mishra:
> 2) Should the WG consider this draft given it has an IPR claim
> 
> Yes

Why?  The IPR appears to indicate that if any entity that asserts any patent
claim against CT, presumably due to infringement, should expect CT to assert
a patent claim for this process.  Retaliatory patent enforcement.  Awesome.
FRAND does not mean settlement-free, nor reasonable.

> or
> 
>     Would the IDR WG prefer another approach?
> 
> We have reviewed other approaches and this provides a finer grain approach
> to dynamically mitigate VPN being overwhelmed by source PE RD offender.  We
> have discussed other approaches and best practice such as VPN maximum
> prefix as well as peer maximum prefix, however this feature resolves a gap
> directly related to offending PE RD originator.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email