Re: [Idr] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 07 April 2020 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8A03A14BA; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 20:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-qCeDDC9Kos; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 20:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE543A14B9; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 20:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id g32so1085874pgb.6; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=ZKaoDFKGGEVQtQge7R8e5ASzoyqt8Bi3xSiBJtpEg9o=; b=HIvSastDZPQt2ENSHnwb3wFvv+tlQML7oGqAz2v8uIwoARbckV9NZe3J58XVXlAfua Z4wvVBOkgxF2ARhsFrppKkxQ41BdHwXamyF3UUJrhUP4z3xz6HBfTz4X7YXF6+iTzhKZ mZBAQDdhhQfccdcvrN9KurKWI2uXkqVJnM2V6DZXHalrVfAZkCFIfdWpayZkPoCLusHJ RvyaSDr9O5lXYFMBQhMBMN04U6HSbYsPAh2z/5/5gkyvKnHKT8lOxscY7Bais00HC54L NAsaEQn3VA0GgLwzcTuOyFyaYd9bXl8iGKpkH2l/65nR8xs9qN7nueL4yLljl7p8V9xz /FgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=ZKaoDFKGGEVQtQge7R8e5ASzoyqt8Bi3xSiBJtpEg9o=; b=heKdmFujLuM8M2QlkySZZ+YW6slc7hjhfDtj3285FP/6aIwJSmJ8jyi2W6JYOI/4v+ JMi/h4mYB+cgckrSZz2d9aAQZYWW2FsjbQv/F3RjKlnTYX8s7w8Bm1ghNUtNCICHWkPi UHgVRwM3pQ/0JP7OPnlS1XDGQwUl+F+aOfOPt6xrf05DgztO143rDXeiYX65QZtbG61E saKG+oansw2zJZkiQBhf8Eckr5eN3adexWueUSSLge/jOJnNsRs5etfRLFWT+LSKTCU1 uGgfdJOP6rTblTy4QJyeC88D9oSr4GsxD80SFFLbj2SreBhpsuytubunXUl/cCtIvc6h A1zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubUogYxLIj3NWNypL0fkWQoXWvhbxXEN5vQSPJwQtOxdOPq+gZS dkIpxEK8jsw6a7dYXVu8y8k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJYaqUEpIdvSLRc7q7BptWwCyMKI8CqwVlvTZ/7olOQ1VOMPxJtcIC5q2mnKY4fNMd8F6fuQw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:6103:: with SMTP id v3mr640936pfb.279.1586231531430; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:28f4:f75f:dbc6:cd22? ([2601:647:5600:5020:28f4:f75f:dbc6:cd22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm13120713pfh.0.2020.04.06.20.52.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 20:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <0D60B755-4CB3-4E5A-A45B-3018FB90452D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4AAAB67A-8A5B-42A2-9338-2E351E0B1750"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 20:52:09 -0700
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB565769B210899D5C4B0A01DEA0C60@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Michael SCHARF <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
References: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D9F11D2@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de> <DB7PR07MB56572390579BC3AC083F152EA0CE0@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DA3BAFD@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de> <DB7PR07MB565769B210899D5C4B0A01DEA0C60@DB7PR07MB5657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3N14-UW7UJh2xDGHB4yhPsNIBvE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 03:52:13 -0000

Hi Tom,

> On Apr 2, 2020, at 4:45 AM, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I note that you have also sent this to Netconf and that you import groupings
>> from the netconf-tcp draft which makes the netconf draft a Normative
>> Reference except that this I-D does not mention that fact.
> 
> [I-D.ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server] is listed as first normative reference in draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp and that dependency is also mentioned in the abstract. With the current structure of the models, it is not clear to me why a reference in the reverse direction would be needed.
> 
> <tp>
> RFC8407 says that YANG import must have a reference which must be a Normative Reference for the I-D.

I will take care of adding a normative reference to [I-D.ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server] both in Section 4 and in the model, in the next version of the draft.

Cheers.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com